PortfoliosLab logo
XCLR vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and ^GSPC is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XCLR:

0.72

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

XCLR:

1.16

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

XCLR:

1.15

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

XCLR:

0.30

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

XCLR:

2.21

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

XCLR:

4.27%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

XCLR:

11.77%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

XCLR:

-46.74%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

XCLR:

-25.26%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 1.30% return.


XCLR

YTD

-1.02%

1M

7.89%

6M

-0.96%

1Y

8.40%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.79%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.35%

5Y*

15.12%

10Y*

10.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XCLR vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XCLR is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XCLR is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XCLR is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XCLR is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XCLR is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XCLR is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -46.74%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is 3.18%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that XCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...